From Cannibals to Radicals
Figures and Limits of Exoticism
Roger Célestin
In this fascinating analysis, Roger Célestin examines the concept of exoticism from a historical and literary perspective. Through close readings of works by Montaigne, Diderot, Flaubert, Barthes, and Naipaul, Célestin examines the way these writers have challenged representations of cultural identity in their time.
In this fascinating analysis, Roger Célestin examines the concept of exoticism from a historical and literary perspective. Through close readings of works by Montaigne, Diderot, Flaubert, Barthes, and Naipaul, Célestin examines the way these writers have challenged representations of cultural identity in their time.
A cogent and convincing rethinking of ‘exoticism’ through readings of Montaigne, Diderot, Flaubert, Barthes, and Naipaul. Provocative in its analyses, From Cannibals to Radicals explores the hybrid and permeable nature of literary production by stressing the shifting crises of representation in their philosophical, anthropological, and historical contexts.
Joan Dayan, University of Arizona
Tags
In this fascinating analysis, Roger Célestin examines the concept of exoticism from a historical and literary perspective. Through close readings of works by Montaigne, Diderot, Flaubert, Barthes, and Naipaul, Célestin examines the way these writers have challenged representations of cultural identity in their time.
Célestin begins with a survey of previous treatments of exoticism in literature, philosophy, political theory, and anthropology. He then argues that the authors under study use exoticism both to interrogate dominant discourses of “home” (in its various forms of empire, Europe, and the center) and to negotiate a tension between home and the exotic rather than opting for one or the other. The texts produced by these authors are the visible signs of this negotiation, and From Cannibals to Radicals examines the figures and tactics of negotiation as they appear in such works as Montaigne’s Essays, Flaubert’s Salammbô, and Barthes’s Empire of Signs.
Célestin shows how, since these writers operate in succeeding chronological periods, they are also to a certain extent representative of their respective historical and cultural moments. Montaigne reflects the general Renaissance discovery of the exotic Other. Diderot demonstrates the French Enlightenment philosophers' widespread use of the exotic as an exemplar and as tool for destabilizing the ruling codes of Home. Flaubert represents a general nineteenth-century aesthetic of oriental exoticism. Barthes enables us to observe the poststructualist focus on language as “inherited past” to be dismantled: the exotic beomes the utopia of language. Finally, V. S. Naipaul’s travels display the limits of exoticism on the postcolonial planet.
Using exoticism as a critical tool rather than as an object of study, From Cannibals to Radicals clarifies its uses as a mode of representation from the Renaissance to the current postcolonial era.
$67.50 cloth ISBN 978-0-8166-2604-5
272 pages, 6 b&w photos, 5 7/8 x 9, 1996
Roger Célestin is associate professor of French and comparative literature at the University of Connecticut at Storrs.
A cogent and convincing rethinking of ‘exoticism’ through readings of Montaigne, Diderot, Flaubert, Barthes, and Naipaul. Provocative in its analyses, From Cannibals to Radicals explores the hybrid and permeable nature of literary production by stressing the shifting crises of representation in their philosophical, anthropological, and historical contexts.
Joan Dayan, University of Arizona
About This Book
Related Publications
Empire Islands
Castaways, Cannibals, and Fantasies of Conquest
Exposes the castaway story’s place in the support of colonialism
Cannibal Democracy
Race and Representation in the Literature of the Americas
Cannibalism as a metaphor for racial assimilation in the United States, the Caribbean, and Brazil
Postcolonial Subjects
Francophone Women Writers
Explores French-language writing by women outside France.
Exotic Parodies
Subjectivity in Adorno, Said, and Spivak
This groundbreaking text begins with the premise that postmodernism, poststructuralism, postcolonialism, and Marxism continue to present certain problems with the self/other distinction. It goes on to offer the first extended critique of the work of Gayatri Spivak; challenge the critical reception of Adorno in the American academy; examine Said's connection to Adorno; and make the first in-depth use of Adorno's Negative Dialectics in the context of postcolonial theory.