Eating Anxiety

Eating Anxiety

The Perils of Food Politics

Chad Lavin

How the experience of eating influences our politics

240 Pages, 6 x 9 in

  • eBook
  • 9781452939339
  • Published: April 7, 2013
BUY
  • Paperback
  • 9780816680924
  • Published: April 21, 2013
BUY

Details

Eating Anxiety

The Perils of Food Politics

Chad Lavin

ISBN: 9781452939339

Publication date: April 7th, 2013

240 Pages

8 x 5

"Ultimately, Lavin reveals how current philosophical and sociohistorical approaches to food help support neoliberal interests, suggesting the need to create alternatives to consumer actions as forms of resistance."—CHOICE

"Eating Anxiety offers a creative and useful contribution that will foster discussion and further inquiry for those interested in the politics of food."—Perspectives on Politics



Debates about obesity are really about the meaning of responsibility. The trend toward local foods reflects the changing nature of space due to new communication technologies. Vegetarian theory capitalizes on biotechnology’s challenge to the meaning of species. And food politics, as this book makes powerfully clear, is actually about the political anxieties surrounding globalization.


In Eating Anxiety, Chad Lavin argues that our culture’s obsession with diet, obesity, meat, and local foods enacts ideological and biopolitical responses to perceived threats to both individual and national sovereignty. Using the occasion of eating to examine assumptions about identity, objectivity, and sovereignty that underwrite so much political order, Lavin explains how food functions to help structure popular and philosophical understandings of the world and the place of humans within it. He introduces the concept of digestive subjectivity and shows how this offers valuable resources for rethinking cherished political ideals surrounding knowledge, democracy, and power.


Exploring discourses of food politics, Eating Anxiety links the concerns of food—especially issues of sustainability, public health, and inequality—to the evolution of the world order and the possibilities for democratic rule. It forces us to question the significance of consumerist politics and—simultaneously—the relationship between politics and ethics, public and private.